Reusable verification for your existing service

Help users present trusted credentials and approve the information your service needs. Evaluate whether reuse can reduce repeated checks and unnecessary document collection.

Try the demonstration Review the pilot proposal

The demo uses fictional credentials. Production availability, independent assurance and government accreditation are separate milestones; none is established by this demonstration.

Evaluate

Start with one useful fact

Interactive Try two services Approve or decline a fictional membership request. Explore expiry, revoked credentials, issuer trust and recovery. For discussion Shape a measured pilot One accountable issuer, two services and an agreed eligibility decision. Compare the result with your existing process. Illustrative Inspect the integration Request and result examples, data boundaries and the production checks still required.

The proposed exchange

Receive the answer your workflow needs

For the proposed membership check, a service receives an active-membership answer, issuer verification material and a fresh request receipt. The presentation excludes names, member numbers, source documents, biometric evidence and another service's consent history.

The production design must demonstrate those boundaries and agree lawful retention before enrolling participants.

Less collection, with clear responsibilities

Reducing document copies can reduce exposure. Credentials, identifiers, logs and receipts still need protection. Your service remains responsible for its decision, lawful processing and retention. An identity credential does not replace financial due diligence.

Delivery

Build trust before extending access

Agree the exact claim and which issuers your service will accept.
Complete the real-device issuance, authentication, consent and presentation flow.
Validate issuer and holder binding, freshness, expiry and credential status.
Provide alternatives, recovery and a clear retention notice.
Measure the pilot before making savings, fraud or production-readiness claims.

VEID can be evaluated as an identity layer without replacing your payment system. No bank, card network or other institution is presented as a confirmed partner.

Proposed issuer policy Authority, evidence, signing keys, status and complaints. Processing and its limits The design goals, remaining evidence and privacy boundaries.

Pilot discussion

Bring a real workflow. Agree what success means.

Review the proposal and discussion pack before committing to integration. No production dependency is offered through this demonstration.

Discuss a pilot Try the demo